Narratives may be designed not to mirror reality but to elicit certain behaviors. In other words, "narrative truths" might serve to correct our innate response to the world around in context of acquired information on the individual level, somewhat like the way that our innate and acquired immune systems function on the cellular level.
Like prairie dog barks, thus for example, the idea that we as individuals are responsible for our actions is not so much a mirror of causal connections (e.g. of a homunculus that controls everything we do according to conscious logic), as it is a narrative designed to redirect our innate reactions (e.g. with paleolithic roots) into acquired reactions which work better in a high-population world. What are some other examples of this use of ideas to redirect perceptions and reactions toward more constructive ends?
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Organism-centric explanations are a natural first-step in the development of constructive narratives to this end. Hence a natural first-response to earthquakes is that "the earth god is angry".
One of the issues we face to today, for instance with help from the concept of herd-immunity, is that in large communities "the sneezer" is not the problem, but rather "the herd's failure to vaccinate". Of course to the paleolithic parts of our brain, "sneezer discrimination" is a much easier concept to grasp.
Post a Comment