The bloodstream in multicelled animals facilitates asynchronous communication between cells and organ systems. Even though each end-user can put out, and read in, what it wants from the bloodstream there exist mechanisms to regulate total concentrations of things like hydrogen ions, salt, glucose, etc.
This suggests an interesting way that governments might regulate constructive use of electronic ideastreams without interfering with either consumer choice or freedom of expression. Look for more on possible specific strategies in this context, here, in the days ahead...
Saturday, June 18, 2011
Monday, June 6, 2011
fact free reporting
Does a dispute about topics (e.g. brain cancer caused by cellphones) become newsworthy just because a familiar name brings it up? Should competent news organizations respect the critical observer in each of their subscribers by referencing relevant observations (e.g. the decline in brain cancer as cell phones proliferate) when technical topics come up in a context whose primary value (for one party or another) may be to pull neolithic strings?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)