Our bodies generally do a pretty good job of sending molecules (like blood thickeners) where they are needed (like the site of a wound) and not where they aren't needed (like in our brain). Our body's circulatory system for molecules is like society's electronic ideastream.
For sustainable use of either molecules or ideas, explicit awareness of the multi-layer structure of our communities as well as the scope of a given communication is crucial.
Like chemical concentration differences from point to point in our bodies, gradients in social access to information are necessary. Intelligent packaging of communications is also important, so that the damage due to occasional spills is minimal. For example confusing countries & corporations with individuals is just as irresponsible, whether you do it as a reporter or as a supreme court justice.
Thus we're all responsible for what we say, what we repeat, and what we listen to. Let's set some better examples downstream...
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Monday, November 29, 2010
pros & cons
Theorem:
Moving toward the negative of anything embedded in a higher-dimensional space reduces the orthogonality (and hence dimensionality) of your path with respect to the postive of that same thing.
Corollary:
X and anti-X are in cahoots, even when they don't act like it.
Moving toward the negative of anything embedded in a higher-dimensional space reduces the orthogonality (and hence dimensionality) of your path with respect to the postive of that same thing.
Corollary:
X and anti-X are in cahoots, even when they don't act like it.
Monday, November 22, 2010
baseball & innovation
"Baseball professionals" might be seen as folks who love the game (in whatever field), and who may aspire to the discipline's hall of fame.
That said, experts in the game are often the last to see opportunities to adapt to new information and developments.
Can you think of any examples of this?
That said, experts in the game are often the last to see opportunities to adapt to new information and developments.
Can you think of any examples of this?
Monday, November 15, 2010
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
layered self-concepts
The cells of animals and plants in practice each maintain their own microbe, tissue & organism selves just as each of us maintain our own organism, family & culture selves.
One difference, of course, is that we each have unique organism, family & culture self-concepts that we can talk about to help us buffer correlations which look inward and outward from the boundaries of our self, our family & our culture.
What fraction of your time are you able to spend looking inward & outward from each?
One difference, of course, is that we each have unique organism, family & culture self-concepts that we can talk about to help us buffer correlations which look inward and outward from the boundaries of our self, our family & our culture.
What fraction of your time are you able to spend looking inward & outward from each?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)